The Ongoing GOP Attack On America’s Infrastructure

Download PDF

“Mr. Mica said of his House colleagues,

Charts_Infrastructure_Investing in US infra._ASCE 2013They wouldn’t vote on a Mother’s Day resolution
if it had extra spending on it.’1

In August 2012, Mark Thoma, economist and Fellow at the American Century Foundation, commented on the incontrovertible need for U.S. infrastructure investment2. He was stunned by Congress’s inability to fund it, even though it would surely boost to the general economy, a supposed goal of the GOP:

“The first is infrastructure spending. We cannot afford to fall behind the rest of the world in terms of our infrastructure development, but that’s exactly what we are doing. At a time when interest rates are as low as we are likely to see, when labor and other costs are minimal due to lack of demand during the downturn, and when the need is so high, why aren’t we making a massive  investment in infrastructure, which is ultimately an investment in our future?  There are many, many public investments we could make where the benefits surely  exceed the costs – these are things the private sector won’t do on its own even  though they are highly valuable to society – so what are we waiting for?3

Particularly confusing for Thoma – and for most of us – is the Republican blockade of infrastructure spending when, in fact, it betrays their own professed beliefs in supply side economics:

“If there’s any policy Republicans ought to be able to support, it’s infrastructure spending. It’s inherently a supply-side policy, it helps to promote future economic growth, and it’s an investment with large, positive net benefits. But Republicans see a ‘we won’t build that’ approach to infrastructure spending. . .”4

TV_Seinfeld_Soup Nazi

No bridge for you!

Since Thoma’s summer 2012 article, the GOP stance on infrastructure remains unchanged even with their strength reduced after November 2012’s electoral train wreck. It’s still, “No infrastructure for you!”  

To fend off the horrific possibility of maintaining America’s bridges and roads, the GOP used their favorite tactic early and often, hostage taking. Here’s an example. In January 2012 the House GOP tried to tie infrastructure investment to – guess what –  their Holy Grail, expanded oil-and-gas development which they asserted would:

“. . . help pay for infrastructure improvements. When new energy resources are  developed, we’ll need updated infrastructure to bring it to market. This creates  a link that will allow for both American energy jobs and American infrastructure  jobs to be created simultaneously,” said House Natural Resources Committee  Chairman Doc Hastings (R-Wash.) in a statement.”5

Workers remove a school bus from the interstate 35W bridge collapse site in Minneapolis, Minn., Sunday, Aug. 12, 2007. The school bus was carrying 52 children from a visit to a water park when it dropped with the bridge during the collapse. All the children survived the fall. (AP Photo/Nati Harnik)

Workers remove a school bus from the interstate 35W bridge collapse site in Minneapolis, Minn., Aug. 12, 2007. The school bus was carrying 52 children. All the children survived the fall. (AP Photo/Nati Harnik)6

Such a deal! The proposal went nowhere. Hostage taking remains, and buttresses their other blunt object, the Senate filibuster.

Moreover, not only is infrastructure investment essential given the accelerating deterioration of many bridges, highways, wastewater treatment facilities, electricity grid, and tunnels7, it is an especially wise time for the federal government to borrow to do so:

“It comes as we may be approaching the end of a five year period in which investing in the nation’s physical infrastructure has been something close to a free lunch. With interest rates near all-time lows and millions of construction workers unemployed, the last few years have been a time that it would have been a historical bargain for the United States to do upgrades to roads, bridges, and airports that will eventually need to take place anyway. It has been a political breakdown—in particular conservatives’ view of almost any non-defense federal spending as wasteful—standing in the way.”8

As Republicans always point out, private businesses desire to invest in a favorable borrowing environment. Interest rates now are as favorable as they have been in many decades. So, once again, in opposing infrastructure investment they belie their own beliefs.

Is it possible that in order to deconstruct the national government, that many Republicans will preside over the terminal deterioration of our national infrastructure, to stand by as more bridges collapse? Yes, it is.  We face a political insurgency, not politics as usual. This decades long rules-busting guerrilla warfare has no other purpose than to destroy the concept of “general welfare.”

The presently malignant GOP will not give up, regardless of election reults. Democrats everywhere, on this and other issues, need to stand taller, shout louder, and use and extend their advantages to the fullest. Otherwise, history may record our Civil War as a Pyrhhic victory . . .

  1. Dueling Bills Seeks to Fund Road, Infrastructure Plans, Josh Mitchell, Wall Street Journal, July 7, 2011
  2. Deteriorating Transportation Infrastructure Could Cost America $3.1 Trillion, Matt Sledge, Huffington Post, Sept. 27, 2011
  3. Republicans: We Won’t Build That, MARK THOMA, The Fiscal Times, Aug. 28, 2012
  4. Id
  5. House GOP ready to move on Boehner’s plan to link drilling and  infrastructure, Ben Geman, The Hill, Jan. 22, 2012
  6. The lessons of 35W, Steve Hirano, School Fleet, Sept. 7, 2011
  7. Investing in Infrastructure (accessed on 02-17-2013
  8. Is Congress really going to miss its free lunch on infrastructure?Neil Irwin, Wonkblog, Feb. 11, 2013

Save pagePDF pageEmail pagePrint page
Please follow and like us:
Download PDF

Michael Matheron

From Presidents Ronald Reagan through George W. Bush, I was a senior legislative research and policy staff of the nonpartisan Library of Congress Congressional Research Service (CRS). I'm partisan here, an "aggressive progressive." I'm a contributor to The Fold and Nation of Change. Welcome to They Will Say ANYTHING! Come back often! . . . . . Michael Matheron, contact me at mjmmoose@gmail.com

You may also like...

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Follow

Get the latest posts delivered to your mailbox: